As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately.

As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients' need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of staff in the surgical floor is a problem the institution has been dealing with for the last year and the problem still has not been corrected. The patient’s satisfaction is compromised, and the nurse patient ratio is high.  Step 1: Identify the problem – Cultivate a spirit of inquiry  Explain, in your own words, what is the problem?  What are the data and sources that validate the problem?  

Safety   Quality indicators   Practice observations   Patient satisfaction   Other   Why is the problem is relevant?   What is the current practice?  

Create the clinical question utilizing the PICOT format – Ask clinical questions utilizing the PICOT format  P = Patient Population  I = Intervention or issue  C = Comparison Intervention or Status  O = Outcome  T = Timeframe to accomplish the O  Final Clinical Question: _________________________________________ 

Searching for the best evidence The student will look at the different databases to search for the strongest evidence that will be used to answer the clinical question.  

Critically appraise the evidence – Summarize the evidence  The student will evaluate the evidence and will choose the ones that will help to answer the clinical question. They will create a summary of the best information found and synthesize the findings.  

Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise  Develop best evidence recommendations  Create an action plan   Implement action plan   Reports results to stakeholders Create a report to the stakeholders   Disseminate findings  Hospital administration meeting – PowerPoint   General Instructions

Remember that your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet, has to be not greater than 10% of plagiarism or AI text. 9 pages References within the past 5 years and with DOI# FORMAT APA, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.  Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).  When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

As a criminal justice professional, you may be required to perform a program evaluation or conduct policy research and analysis and deliver actionable conclusions. Familiarity with evaluation strategies will help you design an effective

As a criminal justice professional, you may be required to perform a program evaluation or conduct policy research and analysis and deliver actionable conclusions. Familiarity with evaluation strategies will help you design an effective assessment and collect meaningful information on programs and policies.

This week you will synthesize what you have learned about policy analysis and program evaluation to develop an evaluation proposal.

Preparation

Review your Weeks 1 and 2 assignments.

Assessment Deliverable

Create a 1,050- to 1,400-word proposal in which you present your plan for a program evaluation for your selected criminal justice program. Develop your proposal from the perspective of a criminal justice professional proposing an evaluation plan and strategies to a supervisor. 

Use the following headings in your proposal and address the following prompts: 

Program Evaluation Planning: Model and Methods Selection 

  • Briefly summarize the criminal justice program (e.g., mission, goals, objectives) you selected in Week 1.
  • Explain which program evaluation model (i.e., embedded evaluation model or the SARA model) you will use to conduct the evaluation. Justify your choice by explaining why the model is most suitable for the program evaluation. 
  • Explain the program evaluation method(s) (e.g., formative, summative, qualitative, quantitative, mixed method) you will use to analyze the program. Justify your choice by explaining why your selected method is most suitable for the program evaluation. 

Program Evaluation Planning: Evaluation Questions Creation

  • Create 2 or 3 evaluation questions you intend to answer as a result of conducting the program evaluation. Provide rationale for each question. 

Program Evaluation Planning: Survey Tool Creation

  • Design a 3- or 4-question survey to collect data related to the evaluation questions you created. Note: Refer to Exhibit III-4, “Tips for Developing Surveys and Survey Questions,” on p. 62 of “Measuring Excellence: Planning and Managing Evaluations of Law Enforcement Initiatives” from the U.S. Department of Justice – Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). 
  • Explain who will take the survey. 
  • Explain what you hope to discover as a result of administering the survey.
  • Identify challenges you may face in conducting the survey or reviewing survey results.

Policy Evaluation Explanation 

  • Briefly summarize the criminal justice policy that you selected in Week 1 that is related to the program outcomes. Explain how research or analysis of your selected criminal justice policy is related to your proposed program evaluation. 

Call To Action/Collaborative Approach to Evaluation

  • Recommend 1 or 2 action steps the supervisor should take after reviewing your evaluation plan. 

Paper: Current Events Ethics Assignment Instructions Overview Our study of ethics in business can sometimes seem esoteric and removed from day-to-day management responsibilities, but media are filled with real-life examples

Paper: Current Events Ethics Assignment Instructions

Overview

Our study of ethics in business can sometimes seem esoteric and removed from day-to-day management responsibilities, but media are filled with real-life examples of unethical business behavior that harms the businesses involved, as well as their shareholders, customers, employees, and other stakeholders. This paper assignment asks you to find such an example, examine what went wrong, and apply the materials we’ve been reading to develop preventions and solutions. Take an in-depth look at the situation through the lens of secular legal and ethical principles but also through the lens of a Biblical worldview.

Instructions

Identify a news story that has been published within the 30 days preceding the due date of this assignment that describes a breach of business ethics. You may find this through a web search, library research, professional journals, professional association websites, newspapers, etc. The breach may be criminal, based in tort, or otherwise unethical.

Your paper will:

  • Briefly explain the situation and the parties involved.
  • Identify your ethical standard; explain how this situation violated that standard.
  • Explain how you would have prevented this situation and would now respond, including support from scholarly and Biblical sources.

Support your analysis with at least 3 scholarly sources other than the course materials (your article will be one), properly cited in APA format in in-text citations and in a reference list. You must also integrate Biblical worldview analysis, including at least 2 Biblical principles with APA citations.

 

This paper must contain at least 800 words and follow current APA format but does not require an abstract. The title page and reference list do not count towards the length requirement. Submit your paper as a Word document.

 

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Design and deliver a Professional Development Plan (PDP) related to the career goal identified within Task One and a range of well explained, developmental and SMART objectives. Follow the instruction below: Here you are

Module Code: BUS4009 Module Title: Digital Skills and Professional Development Assignment type: Self-assessment and PDP Maximum word count: 2000 words

Assignment Task

This is a single assignment that comprises two tasks.

Task One

Analysis and evaluation of a range of soft and digital skills, knowledge and competencies required for a chosen career goal within the modern and digitalised workplace. Try to follow the structure below.

Briefly discuss, with the appropriate underpinning, how recent changes driven by Industry 4.0 so digitalisation, business automation innovation diffusion, etc. impacted a chosen sector that you are interested in pursuing career within. Then identify a range of soft and digital skills required by that sector for your chosen career goal within the modern and digitalised workplace. This section needs to be underpinned by academic and business research to support your arguments. Finally self-assess yourself against those skills, identify and discuss the areas of weaknesses and skill-gaps based on the results from your self-assessments. Note: The evidence of a range of self-assessments undertaken, should be presented with the Appendices. You are required to engage with personal SWOT, Skills diagnostics and one online self-test of your choice.

(1000 Words)

Task Two

Design and deliver a Professional Development Plan (PDP) related to the career goal identified within Task One and a range of well explained, developmental and SMART objectives. Follow the instruction below:

Here you are expected to deliver a Professional Development Plan (PDP) related to the career goal you previously identified, that aims at developing your current skill -gaps. PDP needs to be presented in a tabular format and with use of SMART framework, explain how you are planning to develop in the areas of 3 soft and 2 digital skills in which you are currently underperforming. Note: PDP table is expected to be part of Task 2 wordcount. This section needs to be underpinned by academic and business research to support your arguments.

(1000 Words)

The assessed 2,000-word coursework allows you to explore and consider the relationship between legal systems at national, European, regional and international law, and the extent to which different legal systems conflict

457V0014 Advanced Legal Systems Skills and Research 1

457V0014 Assignment Brief | MMU

CATEGORY : Assignment
SUBJECT : Law
UNIVERSITY : Manchester Metropolitan University
MODULE TITLE : 457V0014 Advanced Legal Systems, Skills and Research 1

Assignment

Choose one of the following titles for your coursework based on comparative law analysis and provide an answer in no more that 2,000 words:

Coursework Titles (Choose ONE):

  1. “The United Kingdom government has led the way in addressing so-called ‘honour’ killings, ‘honour’-based violence/abuse (HBV/A) and forced marriage in law”. Critically discuss this statement whilst undertaking comparative legal analysis with Turkish law.
  2. “The Burqa and hijab bans in France represent a stark contrast in comparison to English law and the protection of religious freedoms”. Critically analyse whether religious clothing should be banned in state institutions (hijab) and public places (burqa) in light of French and UK law.
  3. With reference to legislation, relevant case law and proposals for reform, critically evaluate the current state of the law on assisted dying in the UK, from both ethical and legal perspectives. Your discussion must include a comparative analysis of legal systems that have legalised assisted dying.
  4. Critically analyse the definition of “terrorism” in light of domestic and international law. What are the problems associated with the definition, and what problems do these pose for states and governments at the national and international levels?
  5. Choose your independent topic that addresses an international comparative law question. The topic and law chosen must raise comparative legal issues with regard to international law/legal systems and must be topical.

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed

On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:

  • Explain the underpinnings and sphere of application of the English, European and international legal systems through the use of advanced theoretical approaches and practical case examples.
  • Critically assess the English, European and international legal systems and understand, at an advanced level, the interrelationships between them.
  • Employ high-level legal skills, engage in advanced independent learning and carry out reflective practice appropriate for continuing legal and/or non-legal academic and professional development.
  • Carry out and use independent research into a wide range of complex material on comparative legal systems and engage in sophisticated analysis, synthesis and evaluation, communicating thought-out conclusions clearly and coherently in writing.

Submit Your Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism-Free Answers

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Submission Instructions

The assessed 2,000-word coursework allows you to explore and consider the relationship between legal systems at national, European, regional and international law, and the extent to which different legal systems conflict or complement each other.

Your essay will enable you to investigate and critically evaluate your chosen issue and to put forward your conclusions in writing.

Guidance for Questions

  • For Questions 1-4, the issues we would like you to address are narrow, and you should stick to the focus of the question.
  • You are free to choose any of the questions put forward, or indeed, your topic for the essay (e.g. see Question 5).
  • For Question 5, your focus may be narrow in that you may study a particular aspect of law, or it may be wider in that you may examine the breadth of an area or areas.
  • Whatever question you decide to choose, importantly, your essay should seek to investigate the relationship, comparisons, similarities conflicts of your chosen area.
  • Inevitably, there will need to be a discussion of fundamental human rights.
  • Your area of study should be decided once you have started to engage in some detailed research of the area and once you have considered the principal sources of information.

Assessment Weighting

The essay question is worth 100% of the marks in the subject.

Research & Writing Expectations

As you do your research, bear in mind that your essay should include the following elements:

  • a clear statement as to what you are investigating and the reasons for the investigation;
  • production of sufÏcient research evidence, including discussion of law at national and international (comparative) level;
  • clear arguments based thereupon;
  • serious consideration of alternative arguments or explanations;
  • logical & balanced conclusions;

A good essay is built around a clear structure, so you should outline the main points of your essay before you start writing. It is easier to change your outline than it is to rewrite a fully written paper, so spend some time thinking about the structure of your essay before you engage fully in the writing.

Essay Structure

Your essay should have:

  • a clear introduction
    (stating the subject of the investigation or study, the reasons for doing the investigation or study, outlining the structure of the report and conveying the main issues under consideration)
  • main body
    (in which you present your evidence and put forward comparative arguments thereupon)
  • conclusion
    (in which you summarise your findings and draw your conclusions)

Writing Style

  • Write the essay in coherent paragraphs.
  • Each paragraph should flow naturally and logically from the previous paragraph, and on to the next paragraph, following a clear line of argument.
  • Good writing is clear writing.
  • Write in simple, declarative sentences.
  • Use the active voice, not the passive voice.

Research Sources

  • Engage in sustained research.
  • Use all relevant paper and electronic resources available to you.
  • Use book chapters, journal articles, papers produced by expert bodies, as well as other sources.
  • Do not waste space with very lengthy quotations.
  • Paraphrasing points and arguments, accompanied by necessary referencing, is more important.
  • Given the nature of the questions, it is likely that students will need to engage in electronic databases that allow them to research international law and international legal systems materials.

Word Count

2000 words

(this excludes your footnotes and bibliography. Footnotes should not be used to make substantive points that may be considered to form part of your work).

What You Must Do

  • Undertake a high level of independent research.
  • Use legal sources, including legislation and cases (whether national or international).
  • Use OSCOLA referencing appropriately.
  • Use grammatically correct English.
  • Proofread your work.
  • Attend supporting seminars, lectures and workshops.
  • You must use your own words – the assignment is designed to demonstrate YOUR knowledge (please see the short section on plagiarism).
  • Only use quotes that are short where the impact of the author’s viewpoint would be lost if it were expressed in your own words.
  • Carefully check your Turnitin report.
  • Inform the unit leader if you have a Personal Learning Plan which contains matters relevant to the submission of the assessment and in respect of written coursework, requires an extension before the end of the term.

What You Must NOT Do

  • Do not use Wikipedia or other inappropriate websites.
  • Fail to comply with any of the submission instructions

The United Kingdom government has led the way in addressing so-called ‘honour’ killings, ‘honour’-based violence/abuse (HBV/A) and forced marriage in law”. Critically discuss this statement whilst undertaking comparative legal analysis with Turkish law

457V0014 Advanced Legal Systems Skills and Research 1

457V0014 Assignment Brief | MMU

CATEGORY : Assignment
SUBJECT : Law
UNIVERSITY : Manchester Metropolitan University
MODULE TITLE : 457V0014 Advanced Legal Systems, Skills and Research 1

Assignment

Choose one of the following titles for your coursework based on comparative law analysis and provide an answer in no more that 2,000 words:

Coursework Titles (Choose ONE):

  1. “The United Kingdom government has led the way in addressing so-called ‘honour’ killings, ‘honour’-based violence/abuse (HBV/A) and forced marriage in law”. Critically discuss this statement whilst undertaking comparative legal analysis with Turkish law.
  2. “The Burqa and hijab bans in France represent a stark contrast in comparison to English law and the protection of religious freedoms”. Critically analyse whether religious clothing should be banned in state institutions (hijab) and public places (burqa) in light of French and UK law.
  3. With reference to legislation, relevant case law and proposals for reform, critically evaluate the current state of the law on assisted dying in the UK, from both ethical and legal perspectives. Your discussion must include a comparative analysis of legal systems that have legalised assisted dying.
  4. Critically analyse the definition of “terrorism” in light of domestic and international law. What are the problems associated with the definition, and what problems do these pose for states and governments at the national and international levels?
  5. Choose your independent topic that addresses an international comparative law question. The topic and law chosen must raise comparative legal issues with regard to international law/legal systems and must be topical.

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed

On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:

  • Explain the underpinnings and sphere of application of the English, European and international legal systems through the use of advanced theoretical approaches and practical case examples.
  • Critically assess the English, European and international legal systems and understand, at an advanced level, the interrelationships between them.
  • Employ high-level legal skills, engage in advanced independent learning and carry out reflective practice appropriate for continuing legal and/or non-legal academic and professional development.
  • Carry out and use independent research into a wide range of complex material on comparative legal systems and engage in sophisticated analysis, synthesis and evaluation, communicating thought-out conclusions clearly and coherently in writing.

Submit Your Assignment Questions & Get Plagiarism-Free Answers

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Submission Instructions

The assessed 2,000-word coursework allows you to explore and consider the relationship between legal systems at national, European, regional and international law, and the extent to which different legal systems conflict or complement each other.

Your essay will enable you to investigate and critically evaluate your chosen issue and to put forward your conclusions in writing.

Guidance for Questions

  • For Questions 1-4, the issues we would like you to address are narrow, and you should stick to the focus of the question.
  • You are free to choose any of the questions put forward, or indeed, your topic for the essay (e.g. see Question 5).
  • For Question 5, your focus may be narrow in that you may study a particular aspect of law, or it may be wider in that you may examine the breadth of an area or areas.
  • Whatever question you decide to choose, importantly, your essay should seek to investigate the relationship, comparisons, similarities conflicts of your chosen area.
  • Inevitably, there will need to be a discussion of fundamental human rights.
  • Your area of study should be decided once you have started to engage in some detailed research of the area and once you have considered the principal sources of information.

Assessment Weighting

The essay question is worth 100% of the marks in the subject.

Research & Writing Expectations

As you do your research, bear in mind that your essay should include the following elements:

  • a clear statement as to what you are investigating and the reasons for the investigation;
  • production of sufÏcient research evidence, including discussion of law at national and international (comparative) level;
  • clear arguments based thereupon;
  • serious consideration of alternative arguments or explanations;
  • logical & balanced conclusions;

A good essay is built around a clear structure, so you should outline the main points of your essay before you start writing. It is easier to change your outline than it is to rewrite a fully written paper, so spend some time thinking about the structure of your essay before you engage fully in the writing.

Essay Structure

Your essay should have:

  • a clear introduction
    (stating the subject of the investigation or study, the reasons for doing the investigation or study, outlining the structure of the report and conveying the main issues under consideration)
  • main body
    (in which you present your evidence and put forward comparative arguments thereupon)
  • conclusion
    (in which you summarise your findings and draw your conclusions)

Writing Style

  • Write the essay in coherent paragraphs.
  • Each paragraph should flow naturally and logically from the previous paragraph, and on to the next paragraph, following a clear line of argument.
  • Good writing is clear writing.
  • Write in simple, declarative sentences.
  • Use the active voice, not the passive voice.

Research Sources

  • Engage in sustained research.
  • Use all relevant paper and electronic resources available to you.
  • Use book chapters, journal articles, papers produced by expert bodies, as well as other sources.
  • Do not waste space with very lengthy quotations.
  • Paraphrasing points and arguments, accompanied by necessary referencing, is more important.
  • Given the nature of the questions, it is likely that students will need to engage in electronic databases that allow them to research international law and international legal systems materials.

Word Count

2000 words

(this excludes your footnotes and bibliography. Footnotes should not be used to make substantive points that may be considered to form part of your work).

What You Must Do

  • Undertake a high level of independent research.
  • Use legal sources, including legislation and cases (whether national or international).
  • Use OSCOLA referencing appropriately.
  • Use grammatically correct English.
  • Proofread your work.
  • Attend supporting seminars, lectures and workshops.
  • You must use your own words – the assignment is designed to demonstrate YOUR knowledge (please see the short section on plagiarism).
  • Only use quotes that are short where the impact of the author’s viewpoint would be lost if it were expressed in your own words.
  • Carefully check your Turnitin report.
  • Inform the unit leader if you have a Personal Learning Plan which contains matters relevant to the submission of the assessment and in respect of written coursework, requires an extension before the end of the term.

What You Must NOT Do

  • Do not use Wikipedia or other inappropriate websites.
  • Fail to comply with any of the submission instructions

Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment

MGT502 Assignment 1 Brief 2026

Activity Title: Assignment 1
Paper Number and

Title:

MGT502 Introduction to Human Resource Management

Level 5, 15 Credits

Learning outcomes:

 

LO 1   Evaluate the main functions of human resource   management within business entities.

LO 2   Examine how effective human resource management can contribute to the overall efficiency and strategic goals of organisations.

Conditions: This is a compulsory assignment and non-submission will result in failing the paper. No re-sits or resubmissions are allowed.

To pass this paper an overall grade of 50% must be achieved across all assessments, attaining no less than 35% for each individual assessment.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Due Date: 6pm Monday Week 12, via Blackboard

Word count: 2000 words (+/- 10%) excluding your referencing, tables and appendices.

Contribution: 45%

References: a minimum of 4 academically relevant sources should be used to support your work Style: Report

Qualification outcome expectations

Research and referencing: You are required to engage in some research into the theories or concepts underpinning this topic and use other relevant sources beyond the provided reading material in order to successfully complete this assignment. Ensure you are choosing relevant academic sources and using them well to support your arguments. Ensure you include citations and a full reference list using the latest APA guidelines.

Presentation guidelines: Work is expected to be word-processed and submitted as a Word document or PDF, using a clear, readable font and be within 10% of the given word count (excluding any referencing). Include your name, student number and the paper code and assignment number as a header or footer. Reports should include headings or subheadings as required. Essays should include an introduction, body and conclusion. Spellchecking (NZ English) and proofreading of work prior to submission is strongly encouraged.

TASK INSTRUCTIONS

Select an organisation that you are familiar with (this could be as an employee or a customer). It is recommended that the selected organisation be of medium to large size (20+ employees) and operate in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Please do not collect any information directly from the organisation, only use what is publicly available (i.e. secondary data sources).

Consider yourself as the Human Resource Manager for this organisation. You have recently been tasked with designing human resource management practices (based on functions) for a managerial level position within your selected organisation (such as Marketing Manager, Accounts Manager, Quality Manager, Finance Manager) and need to discuss how effective human resource management contributes to organisational success.

This information must be presented in a report format and include the following elements:

  1. Title page (Title of assessment, student name and ID, course name and code) – not part of the word count
  2. Table of Contents (include a clear and numbered list of headings and subheadings with corresponding page numbers) – not part of the word count
  3. Introduction (briefly introduce purpose and structure of report) – 50 words
  4. Brief organisational overview (history, size, mission, vision and main activities), job title and brief overview of job tasks of the selected position– 150 words
  5. Evaluation of human resource management functions – 1300 words

a. Human Resource planning

  • Apply the five step HR planning process to the selected position.

b. Recruitment and selection

  • Evaluate one recruitment and one selection method appropriate for the selected position and include two advantages and two disadvantages for each of these methods.

c. Performance management

  • Evaluate one performance measurement method appropriate for the selected position and include two advantages and two disadvantages for this method.

d. Employee and labour relations

  • Evaluate employer and employee responsibilities under Employment Relations Act 2000.

e. Training and development

  • Evaluate one training method appropriate for the selected position and include two advantages and two disadvantages for this method.

f. Remuneration and rewards management

  • Design a remuneration package appropriate for the selected position.

g. Health, safety and wellbeing

  • Evaluate employer and employee responsibilities under Health and Safety at work Act 2015
  1. Discuss how human resource management contributes to achieving organisational efficiency and strategic goals. Include at least four human resource management function examples in your discussion. (400 words)
  2. Conclusion (summarising key findings) – 100 words
  3. Reference list (in lasted APA style) – not part of the word count

MGT502 Assignment 1 Marking schedule

Criteria A (80-100) B (65-79) C (50-64) D (40-49) E (0-39) 
Introduction

Weighting 2%

 

Clear, correct and succinct introduction provided that covers purpose and structure of report. Mostly clear and correct introduction that covers purpose and structure of report. A satisfactory introduction that mostly correctly covers purpose and structure of report. Limited or unclear introduction with either purpose or structure missing. Incomplete or incorrect introduction provided.
Organisational overview

Weighting 5%

Clear, correct and succinct organisational overview provided that covers history, mission/ vision and objectives.

Clear and correct job title included.

Clear and correct overview of job tasks included.

Mostly clear and correct organisational overview provided that covers history, mission/ vision and objectives.

Clear and correct job title included.

Clear and correct overview of job tasks included.

A basic organisational overview provided with history, mission/ vision and objectives mostly covered.

Correct job title included.

Correct overview of job tasks included.

Limited or unclear organisational overview provided with either history, mission/ vision or objectives missing.

Job title included.

Limited overview of job tasks included.

Incomplete or incorrect organisational overview provided.

Incomplete or

incorrect job title and overview of job tasks included.

Evaluation of human

resource management

functions

Weighting

50%

Clear, correct and succinct evaluation of all HRM functions with relevance to selected position and organisation provided. Mostly clear and correct evaluation of all HRM functions with relevance to selected position and organisation provided. A basic evaluation of most HRM functions with relevance to selected position and organisation provided. Limited or unclear evaluation of HRM functions with relevance to selected position and organisation provided Incomplete or unclear evaluation of HRM functions with relevance to selected position and organisation provided.
HRM

contribution to organisational efficiency and goal achievement

Weighting

15%

Clear, correct and succinct discussion on how HRM

contributes to organisational efficiency and goal achievement.

Mostly clear and correct discussion on how HRM

contributes to organisational efficiency and goal achievement.

A basic discussion is given on how HRM contributes to organisational efficiency and goal achievement. Limited or unclear discussion is given on how HRM

contributes to organisational efficiency and goal achievement.

Incomplete or unclear discussion is given on how HRM contributes to organisational efficiency and goal achievement.
Conclusion

Weighting 3%

Clear, correct and succinct conclusion covering all key findings provided. Mostly clear and correct conclusion covering all key findings provided. A satisfactory conclusion covering most key findings provided. Limited or unclear conclusion covering some key findings provided. Incomplete or unclear conclusion provided.
Research

Weighting

10%

At least minimum required number of sources used.

All sources are very well-chosen, authoritative and highly appropriate for the task.

Excellent use of sources to support and extend arguments.

At least minimum required number of sources used.

Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task.

Sources mostly well used        to                 support arguments.

Minimum required number of sources used.

Some sources lack strong relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task.

Sources adequately used to support arguments.

Less than minimum required number of sources used, or sources are not relevant for the task.

Limited or unclear use of sources to support argument.

Little or no evidence of research, or sources not relevant for the task.

Little or no use of sources to support argument.

 

Writing and organisation

Weighting 10%

 

Polished presentation.

Clear, concise and well-structured writing throughout.

Good presentation.

Clear writing mainly to the point.  Mostly well organised and structured writing.

Adequate presentation.

Mostly clear writing

that shows acceptable

Inadequate presentation.

Some evidence of clear or structured writing.

 

No consideration for presentation.

Little evidence of clear writing or structure, very difficult to follow.

All research is very well integrated with the main text.

Excellent spelling and grammar,

correct in all aspects.

The research is mostly well integrated with the main text.

Good spelling and grammar with only minor oversights that do not impact on readability.

organisation and structure.

The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently.

Few issues around grammar and/or spelling, some of which have a minor impact on readability.

Limited evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text.

Some grammatical and/or spelling errors that impact noticeably on readability.

The research has not been linked to the main text.

Numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors that have a significant impact on readability.

In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted

Weighting 5%

References and intext citations follow all APA guidelines. References and intext citations follow most APA guidelines. References and/or in-text citations

follow some APA guidelines.

References and/or in-text citations do not follow APA guidelines or limited referencing attempted.

MKTG3000 Strategic Marketing Management MKTG3000 Assessment Group Report Instructions 1. Assessment Overview Assessment Type: Group Written Report – Situational Analysis Course: MKTG3000

MKTG3000 Strategic Marketing Management MKTG3000 Assessment Group Report Instructions 

  1. Assessment Overview Assessment Type: Group Written Report – Situational Analysis

Course: MKTG3000 Strategic Marketing Management

Length: Approximately 5,000 words

Weighting: 20%

Due Date: Sunday of Week 7 @ 11:59pm via Turnitin

  1. Purpose Of The Task This assessment is designed to evaluate your ability to apply strategic marketing theory to a real-world organisation. You will work collaboratively to analyse the internal and external environment of a selected company or strategic business unit (SBU), synthesise findings into a SWOT analysis, and identify a feasible strategic opportunity. The report should demonstrate professional judgement, strategic insight, and effective use of marketing frameworks including the Resource-Based View (RBV) and BCG Matrix.
  2. Report Structure & Content Requirements Title Page Include company/product/brand name and names and student numbers of all group members.

Executive Summary Summarise the entire report including key findings, recommendations, and conclusions.

Table Of Contents Include numbered headings and subheadings with page numbers.

Introduction

Outline the purpose of the report, company background, and report format. Briefly discuss mission/vision and corporate structure. Use secondary sources to support company background and strategic context.

Internal Analysis

Evaluate the company’s strengths and weaknesses. Include key capabilities, assets, and resources using the Resource-Based View (RBV). Use the BCG Matrix to assess the company’s position within its overall portfolio. Support analysis with secondary data such as financial reports, industry benchmarks, and strategic reviews.

Market/Customer Situation

Analyse industry trends, target markets using STP, and consumer behaviour. Use secondary market research, industry reports, and consumer data to support your analysis.

Marketing Mix Analysis

Evaluate the 7Ps of marketing, identifying strengths and weaknesses. Support each element with secondary data such as promotional materials, pricing strategies, distribution channels, and customer reviews.

Competitive Analysis

Identify key competitors and assess their strategies, strengths, and weaknesses. Use secondary sources such as competitor websites, industry analysis, and market share data.

Macro-Environment Analysis

Use the PESTEL framework to identify external opportunities and threats. Support each factor with credible secondary data from government reports, industry publications, and news sources.

SWOT Analysis & Opportunity Identification

Synthesise internal and external findings. Identify and justify one strategic opportunity. Ensure the opportunity is supported by secondary evidence and strategic rationale.

Conclusion 

Summarise key strategic insights.

References Use APA format. Include credible and relevant secondary sources throughout the report to support all analyses and recommendations.

Appendices Include supporting data, charts, or visuals if necessary.

Hire A Professional Essay & Assignment Writer For Completing Your Academic Assessments Flexible Rates Compatible With Everyone’S Budget

Order Now The University Of Newcastle All Management Assessment Module Specification 2026 1000-Level MNGT1001 – Introduction to Management and Sustainability 2000-Level MNGT2006 – Management in Environmental Turbulence MNGT2007 – Ideation in Enterprise MNGT2008 – Digital Business Applications MNGT2009 – Organisational Behaviour 3000-Level (Undergraduate / Elective) MNGT3002 – Knowledge Management MNGT3006 – Entrepreneurial Strategy MNGT3007 – Social Entrepreneurship MNGT3008 – Advanced Innovation Management MNGT3009 – Business Development and Growth MNGT3011 – Leading Organisational Change MNGT3012 – Business Strategy MNGT3013 – Innovation Management MNGT3014 – Managing Inclusion, Diversity and Equity in Organisations

A jury requires the presentation of sufficient evidence to prove the accused is guilty. They want to understand how and why the crime occurred. An investigator must utilize the ev

A jury requires the presentation of sufficient evidence to prove the accused is guilty. They want to understand how and why the crime occurred. An investigator must utilize the evidence and their deductive reasoning to explain how the crime was carried out and explain a motive for the accused to carry out the crime. One example of deductive reasoning involves explaining how the crime occurred and how the evidence proves the accused carried out the crime.

This exercise will utilize the student's deductive reasoning to describe how someone could carry out the "perfect crime." A perfect crime is one where the guilty party would not be caught because law enforcement could not determine who committed the crime or prove their guilt. Keep in mind, your scenario must be realistic.

Write an essay detailing how someone would commit an unlawful killing or felonious theft. The essay will be 200 – 500 words in length, use 12 font and be in chronological order. Remember must be realistic, if you describe a murder the victim must be connected to the killer in some fashion (Do NOT use an example where a random is person is killed for no discernable reason). Essay will contain the following:

  1. Time of day & day of week crime committed
  2. Describe the type of location and or area where the crime will be committed include type of lighting, possible witnesses in area, etc.
  3. Your alibi
  4. Your motive for committing the crime
  5. How you would obtain the necessary weapons/tools
  6. What is your getaway plan
  7. How would you enter/exit the location
  8. Describe exactly how you would commit the murder/theft
  9. For theft related crimes; you MUST detail what you plan to do with the stolen property
  10. BE SPECIFIC, utilize information provided from the TEXTBOOK. 200 – 500 words

Be REALISTIC, people who kill will do so for a reason, people who steal also have target certain items

Content Grading Criteria Points Score • Introduce the focus of paper 10 • Briefly describe the roles of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in professional nursing practice. Correlate with TXBON, DEC, and AACN. 15 • Develop a professional development plan

Content Grading Criteria Points Score • Introduce the focus of paper 10 • Briefly describe the roles of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in professional nursing practice. Correlate with TXBON, DEC, and AACN. 15 • Develop a professional development plan for incorporating the Texas Board of Nursing Differentiated Essential Competencies and the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education into your BSN nursing practice in the year following graduation. • Correlate with DEC and AACN Essentials 20 • PROVIDE EVIDENCE FROM THE NURSING JOURNAL TO SUPPORT YOUR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IDENTIFY THE NEED FOR THE ROLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. 25 • Conclude by summarizing key points of paper 10 Professional Writing Grading Criteria • Style and Format o Follow APA 7th ed. style and format o Paper must be a minimum of 2 pages and maximum of 4 pages, not including title page and reference page 10 • Scholarship o References are relevant for topic o References include: ▪ A minimum of 2 scholarly sources from professional nursing journals published within the last 5 years with working URL or DOI ▪ Course text book ▪ AACN Baccalaureate Essentials ▪ Texas Board of Nursing DECs 10 TOTAL 100