Create a Report for Executives on Artificial Intelligence Elements, Importance, and Cybersecurity Options
Hide Folder InformationTurnitin™This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.Instructions
Background As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, traditional defense mechanisms are insufficient. This has given rise to a new approach that utilizes the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), data architecture, and threat intelligence to safeguard sensitive information and ensure business continuity. The increased use of technology in the workplace creates greater opportunities for security breaches; organizations must be proactive in detecting anomalies to thwart threats and protect organizational and customer data. Deep learning models can be used to examine large sets of network traffic data and identify behavior that might signal an attempted attack on the network.
Instructions Select and use an organization of your choice. Then, write a report that addresses an organization’s executives that includes the following information:
Categorize the organization’s elements within ADSAI solutions. Specify their importance within the organization's data protection. Create a report highlighting the role of AI in cybersecurity of organization’s data (deterrence and/or recovery). Incorporate benefits of using ADSAI and propose new cybersecurity trends applicable to the organization. Be sure to integrate resources and create strong support for your decision or address the identified problem. Length: This assignment must be 7 pages (excluding the title and reference pages).
References: Include 12 scholarly resources (7 of them can be from previously used references).
The completed document should address all assignment requirements, show evidence of concept knowledge, and show thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the lecture. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards (7th ed.), with respect to citations and reference entries in the Works Cited list, and adhere to Academic Integrity Policy.
CriteriaExceeds Expectations (90%-100%) A. A-Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B-Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, CDeficient (40%-72%) C-. FNot Evident (0%-39%) FCriterion ScoreADSAI elements are categorized in a logical, direct, and concise manner that is relevant and important to the chosen organization. Sources appropriate to the researched topic and multiple criteria are selected.3 points
ADSAI elements are categorized in a logical, direct, and concise manner that is relevant and important to the chosen organization. Sources appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question are selected. Selects sources relevant to the researched topic and the multiple criteria used (such as credibility, relevance to the research question, currency, authority, audience, and bias or point of view).
2.6 points
ADSAI elements are categorized in a logical, direct, and concise manner that is relevant and important to the chosen organization. Sources appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question are selected. Selects sources relevant to the researched topic and the multiple criteria used (such as credibility, relevance to the research question, currency, authority, audience, and bias or point of view). Brief improvements are needed to strengthen the case.
2.3 points
ADSAI elements are categorized in a logical, direct, and concise manner that is relevant and important to the chosen organization. Sources appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question are selected. Selects sources relevant to the researched topic and the multiple criteria used (such as credibility, relevance to the research question, currency, authority, audience, and bias or point of view). More than a brief improvement is needed to address all the requirements of the assignment.
1.2 points
ADSAI elements are briefly categorized logically, directly, or concisely, and they are little relevant or important to the chosen organization. Por ability to choose a variety of information sources appropriate to the scope and discipline of the research question as well as resources to support the next steps. Has challenges in selecting sources after considering the importance (to the researched topic) of the multiple criteria used (such as credibility, relevance to the research question, currency, authority, audience, and bias or point of view). Significant improvement is needed.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major improvement overall.
Score of ADSAI elements are categorized in a logical, direct, and concise manner that is relevant and important to the chosen organization. Sources appropriate to the researched topic and multiple criteria are selected.,/ 3Assignment Instructions2 points
Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.
1.7 points
Correctly completed most of the assignment instructions.
1.5 points
Incorrectly completed some parts of the assignment.
0.8 points
Incorrectly completed most parts of the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Assignment Instructions,/ 2Content and Critical Thinking2 points
Strong evidence of content knowledge.
Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.
1.7 points
Good evidence of content knowledge.
In general, improvement in responses to demonstrate critical thinking is needed.
1.52 points
Some evidence of content knowledge.
Some improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0.8 points
Little evidence of content knowledge.
Significant improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Content and Critical Thinking,/ 2Cohesion & Organization2 points
Effectively communicates a central idea or point that is present throughout the entirety of the assignment, in a coherent and logical manner. Overall writing is easy to understand.
1.7 points
Communicates a central idea or point that is present through most of the assignment in a coherent manner. Overall writing, for the most part, is easy to understand.
1.5 points
Communicates a central idea or point in the assignment but may incorporate other unrelated topics. Coherence and organization are somewhat evident.
0.8 points
Communicates several unconnected ideas or points, with no apparent pattern or coherence.
0 points
Does not display a sense of organization or coherence. Non-existent, or lacks clear expression of relevant ideas or points.
Score of Cohesion & Organization,/ 2Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources1 point
No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.85 points
Some misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.75 points
Many misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Some resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0.4 points
Significant number of misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources,/ 1
TotalScore of Assignment 3 Rubric,/ 10 Overall Score Exceeds Expectation (90-100%) A, A- 9 points minimum
Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B- 8 points minimum
Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, C 7.3 points minimum
Deficient (40%-72%) C-, F 4 points minimum
Not Evident (0%-39%) F 0 points minimum
