|
Criterion
1 (LO1) 33% weighting
Critically
evaluate the different schools of leadership and management practice.
This
should include evidence of:
§ A range of relevant reading around the topics
of leadership and/or management.
§ Critical analysis of the subject matter in
relation to a chosen sector/industry.
|
The
work does not include reference to any relevant sources related to the
subject matter.
There
are no analysis or synthesis of the subject matter and no clear links to an
identified sector/industry are evident.
|
The
work only uses inappropriate literature sources for an academic assignment
(e.g. blogs, newspaper articles) none from academic journal articles that
relate to the topic and weak relevance to the task.
The
work presents limited/weak analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and partial
links to an identified sector/industry are evident offering no original
insight and thought leadership opportunities.
|
The
work uses a small number of appropriate literature sources (e.g. textbooks,
trusted websites) some of which are from academic journal articles that
loosely relate to the topic and some limited relevance to the task.
The
work presents satisfactory analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and some
links to the identified sector/industry are evident but offers little original
insight and thought leadership opportunities.
|
The
work uses a range of relevant appropriate literature sources (e.g. textbooks,
trusted websites), some of which are from academic journal articles that
loosely relate to the topic that are mostly relevant to the task.
The
work presents a good analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and links
to the identified sector/industry but does not offer much original insight
and thought leadership opportunities.
|
The
work uses a wide range of relevant appropriate literature sources (e.g.
textbooks, trusted websites) and some academic journal articles that mostly
relate to the topic that are mostly relevant to the task, some of which may
be at the cutting edge of academic and professional knowledge.
The
work presents very good analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and
links to the identified sector/industry that could offer original insight and
possible thought leadership opportunities.
|
The
work uses a wide range of relevant appropriate literature sources (e.g.
textbooks, trusted websites) and some academic journal articles which are
highly relevant to the task some of which may be at the cutting edge of
academic and professional knowledge.
The
work presents an excellent analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and
links to the identified sector/industry that offer some original insight and
thought leadership opportunities.
|
The
work uses a wide range of relevant appropriate literature sources (e.g.
textbooks, trusted websites) and many academic journal articles which are
highly relevant to the topic, some of which are at the cutting edge of
academic and professional knowledge.
The
work presents an outstanding analysis and synthesis of the subject matter and
links to the identified sector/industry that offers original insight and
thought leadership.
|
|
Criterion
2 (LO2)
33%
weighting
Complete
an internship or personal career development activity.
This
should include evidence of:
§ Completion
of an appropriate activity.
§ Demonstration
of developmental need and links to chosen sector/industry.
§ Evaluation
of performance and lessons learned from completion of the activity.
|
No
completion of a career development activity or activities.
No
links to the skills required for the sector/industry is evident with no
evidence of academic underpinning, and no links to the latest thinking in
skills development are presented.
No
self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical reflection from the
chosen activity/activities, no use of a critical self-reflective tool or
tools have been attempted.
|
Partial
completion of a career development activity or activities.
Weak
link to the skills required for the sector/industry is evident with limited
evidence of academic underpinning, and no links to the latest thinking in
skills development are presented.
An
unsatisfactory self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical
reflection from the chosen activity/activities, no use of a critical
self-reflective tool or tools have been attempted.
|
Completion
of a satisfactory career development activity or activities.
Some
link to the skills required for the sector/industry is evident with some
evidence of academic underpinning, but no links to the latest thinking in
skills development are presented.
A
satisfactory self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical
reflection from the chosen activity/activities, some use of a critical
self-reflective tool or tools have been attempted but there are some
errors/omissions evident.
|
Completion
of a good career development activity or activities.
Some
link to the latest thinking in skills development for the chosen
sector/industry, supported by academic and professional sources some of which
may be at the cutting edge of thought leadership.
A
good self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical reflection
from the chosen activity/activities, use of a critical self-reflective tool
or tools have been attempted but there are some errors/omissions evident.
|
Completion
of a very challenging career development activity or activities.
Clear
link to the latest thinking in skills development for the chosen
sector/industry, supported by academic and professional sources some of which
may be at the cutting edge of thought leadership.
Comprehensive
self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical reflection from the
chosen activity/activities, use of a critical self-reflective tool or tools
have been attempted but there are some errors/omissions evident.
|
Completion
of a very challenging career development activity or activities.
Clear
link to the latest thinking in skills development for the chosen
sector/industry, supported by academic and professional sources that are at
the cutting edge of thought leadership.
Comprehensive
self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical reflection from the
chosen activity/activities, using a recognised critical self-reflective tool
or tools.
|
Completion
of an extremely challenging career development activity or activities.
Clear
link to the latest thinking in skills development for the chosen
sector/industry, supported by academic and professional sources that are at
the cutting edge of thought leadership.
Comprehensive
self-evaluation of the student’s performance and critical reflection from the
chosen activity/activities using a recognised critical self-reflective tool
or tools.
|
|
Criterion
3 (LO3)
33%
weighting
Critically
assess their own performance as an undergraduate and their future career
aspiration.
This
should include evidence of:
§ Critical
self-reflection of academic performance and graduate skills development.
§ Comprehension
of the graduate career pathway for their role and/or sector/industry.
§ Graduate
career planning for the next 12 months.
|
No
critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance using any
performance metrics.
No
overview or awareness of the graduate career pathway within a chosen sector
that has no links to the student’s future career role if identified.
No
graduate career plan has been provided.
|
An
unsatisfactory critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance
using a limited range or single performance metric providing limited insight.
An
unsatisfactory overview with limited awareness of the graduate career pathway
within the chosen sector that has partial links to the student’s future
career role.
A
graduate career plan has been provided that demonstrates partial insight into
the process of securing a graduate role/future career role.
|
A
satisfactory critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance
using a range of different performance metrics providing satisfactory
insight.
A
satisfactory overview with some awareness of the graduate career pathway
within the chosen sector that has some links to the student’s future career
role.
A
graduate career plan has been provided that demonstrates some insight into
the process of securing a graduate role/future career role.
|
A
good critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance using a
range of different performance metrics providing good insight.
A
good overview of the graduate career pathway within the chosen sector that is
has some links to the student’s future career role.
An
informative graduate career plan that demonstrates good insight and thinking
into the process of securing a graduate role/future career role.
|
A
very good critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance
using a range of different performance metrics providing very good insight.
A
very good overview of the graduate career pathway within the chosen sector
that is clearly linked to the student’s future career role.
A
detailed and informative graduate career plan that demonstrates very good insight
and thinking into the process of securing a graduate role/future career
role.
|
An
excellent critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance
using a range of different performance metrics providing outstanding insight.
An
accomplished and possibly publishable overview of the graduate career pathway
within the chosen sector that is clearly linked to the student’s future
career role.
A
highly detailed and informative graduate career plan that demonstrates
excellent insight and thinking into the process of securing a graduate
role/future career role.
|
A
comprehensive critical self-reflection of the student’s academic performance
using a range of different performance metrics providing outstanding insight.
An
accomplished and publishable overview of the graduate career pathway within
the chosen sector that is clearly linked to the student’s future career role.
A
highly detailed and informative graduate career plan that demonstrates outstanding
insight and thinking into the process of securing a graduate role/future
career role.
|
