HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion
HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion HCA 459 Week 1 DQ 1 Organizational Survival…
Published: December 6, 2025
Brief: Coursework II – Set Exercise [75%]
Submission Deadline: 8th December 2025
Feedback Date: 13th January 2026
Module Title: Intelligence Engineering and Infrastructure
Module Code: COM774 (79166)
Semester (s) Taught: One Course / Year Group: MSc CS/AI/AI(CUQ)/7
Coursework / Exam Weighting: 75% (of Total coursework)
When submitting your assignment you are agreeing to the following statement:
“I declare that this is all my own work. Any material I have referred to has been accurately referenced and any contribution of Artificial Intelligence technology has been fully acknowledged. I understand the importance of academic integrity and have read and understood the University’s General Regulation: Student Academic Integrity and the Academic Misconduct Procedure. I understand that I must not upload my work before, during or after submission to any unapproved plagiarism detectors or answer sharing platforms, or equivalent, and that only University-approved platforms should be used. A mark of zero may be awarded and the reason for that mark will be recorded on my file.”
Policies, procedures, resources etc. can be found on the Academic Misconduct SharePoint site: https://ulster.sharepoint.com.mcas.ms/sites/AcademicIntegrity.
This module is assessed by two pieces i.e. coursework CW1 and CW2.
Coursework II is explained in the document as follows:
In Coursework CW2, the focus will shift to the remaining stages of the MLOps workflow. This includes Model Development, where machine learning models are designed, trained, and validated; CI/CD, which automates testing and integration of code, data, and models; and Deployment, where models are moved into production environments. It also covers Monitoring, to track performance and detect issues such as data drift; Retraining, to update models with new data; and Governance, which ensures compliance, transparency, and accountability across the entire lifecycle.
1. Autonomously and independently evaluate deficiencies when interacting with a range of technologies and leveraging knowledge of these deficiencies to improve future practice.
2. Appraise, select and autonomously apply skills to leverage a range of machine learning paradigms.
3. Demonstrate the ability to critically appraise meant by Intelligence engineering and infrastructure and how a variety of processes and paradigms may be applied to address the challenges it presents.
Students will be set an individual exercise where they will be expected to utilize the previously identified dataset in CW1 which can be further used to produce a machine learning model to address a problem. Students will then implement a solution to the problem using technologies and techniques covered in the module.
Specifically for this exercise, students are required to perform the following 3 tasks.
Using the dataset identified in CW1 (e.g., human activity recognition dataset), design a solution that applies MLOps processes and technologies. Your design should include:
Prepare a slide deck (approx. 12 content slides) containing an embedded 5-minute video demonstration.
The video should:
Assessment Criteria: Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria:
1. Problem Definition and Discussion (10%)
2. Overview of the Technical Solution Developed (15%)
3. Testing Approaches (20%)
4. Performance Evaluation and Scalability (20%)
5. Concluding Comments, References & Presentation (10%)
6. Video Demonstration (25%)
Note: Total: 100% (equivalent to 75% of module mark)
Prepare your presentation slides.
Record your video presentation.
Combine slides and video
Final checks
Upload to Blackboard
Plagiarism and academic integrity
Note: According to Ulster University Assessment Code of Practice, where submitted work exceeds the agreed assessment limit, a margin of up to +10% of the work limit will be allowed without any penalty of mark deduction. If the work submitted is significantly in excess of the specified limit (+10%), there is no expectation that staff will assess the piece beyond the limit or provide feedback on work beyond this point. Markers will indicate the point at which the limit is reached and where they have stopped marking. A mark will be awarded only for the content submitted up to this point. No additional deduction or penalty will be applied to the overall mark awarded. The student is self-penalising as work will not be considered/marked.
N.B. Students should be aware of the plagiarism policy of the University and submit their coursework in accordance with this.
N.B. The students are required to implement this solution using the concepts and techniques which were the focus of the teaching materials in this module. This may broadly have a focus on a hosted/cloud native design or a containerised solution. It is recommended that students appraise both these design approaches in their slides.
Chat with a verified tutor and get a clear, original answer.
Ask your own question and get a verified answer from a tutor or top student.
Ask a Question