HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion
HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion HCA 459 Entire Course Discussion HCA 459 Week 1 DQ 1 Organizational Survival Strategies. DocHCA…
Read QuestionPublished: January 1, 2026
| COM6013 Cybersecurity |
| Session | Grad Year 2025/26 |
|---|---|
| Credits | 60 |
| Lecturer(s) | Various – a project supervisor will be allocated prior to the start of the Spring Semester. |
| Resources | Blackboard |
For their individual project, students can choose from a wide range of possibilities in many different environments both within and outside the University. The project is completed during the summer, and each student will have a personal academic supervisor to guide them during this period. The individual project is examined by a dissertation based on the project work and an oral examination. This module has been designed for students taking the MSc Cybersecurity and AI programme. The topic will be at the interface of Cybersecurity and AI. This provides a significant element of “glue” bringing together the two areas that make up the programmes.
Assessment of the module is by a dissertation that is produced towards the end of the second semester, complemented by a presentation session where the work done is to be demonstrated and questions answered. If considered appropriate by the examiners an oral examination may be held.
This unit aims to:
By the end of the unit, a candidate will be able to:
LO1 research the background to a challenging research problem in cybersecurity. Specifically: a) survey relevant literature and comment critically on it b) identify/confirm an original and challenging research question (or questions) to be addressed and appreciate the feasibility of doing so within the time available on the project;
LO2 plan, monitor and possibly re-plan work according to progress made;
LO3 identify what needs to be done to answer the research question(s), and to identify and evaluate appropriate approaches and techniques to be used to develop the solution (i.e. identify an appropriate methodology), and then synthesise a solution. It includes developing understanding of the capabilities of available resources (such as tools and techniques) and whether they suffice to underpin a solution as well as the identification of a specific solution path. Note: methodology must take into account ethics and other contextual considerations. The student will be able to justify any decisions and choices made.
LO4 demonstrate competence in using appropriate solution tools;
LO5 evaluate work done in an appropriately rigorous manner and use the results to draw appropriate conclusions or inform further work. This will include, for example, identification of evaluation criteria, testing or analysis of artefacts developed (e.g. software), demonstration of reasonable experimental practices, critical review of assumptions made, appreciation of threats to validity, drawing evidenced conclusions, and identification of future work;
LO6 demonstrate an appreciation of the professional, social, ethical, legal and other contextual considerations that apply to the work they have done. Note the area of Cybersecurity raises interesting contextual issues. The MSc in predominantly ‘technical’ in nature but we do require an appreciation of wider issues;
LO7 to document work carried out in a form suitable for a technically able but not necessarily specialist audience. For working purposes the reader will generally be a computer scientist but not necessarily expert in cybersecurity or AI. Thus, the student must be able to document suitably all aspects in the lifecycle of the project: background, through requirements, design, implementation, evaluation and conclusions;
LO8 To present effectively work in progress and engage in constructive discussion about that work and its context.
All projects must have a significant cybersecurity focus. Students will be able to pursue a project involving both cybersecurity and AI, but are not obliged to do so.
The content of the project is typically selected by the student from a range of topics proposed by the staff or industrial partners of the department. Students are also encouraged to propose their own topic, provided they can find a supervisor willing to supervise it and with the agreement of the Projects Officer.
Assignments marked using published criteria, submission commented and returned by Blackboard within 3 weeks. Students will meet with their supervisors regularly (and, where relevant, external clients) to discuss progress and problems encountered, and to review issues that arise during the project.
This module is exempt from the University’s Regulations relating to Intellectual Property which can be found at: policies-guidance
Chat with a verified tutor and get a clear, original answer.
The section below is a preview. Use the button to access the complete answer or request help with this question.
Ask your own question and get a verified answer from a tutor or top student.
Ask a Question