Critical thinking is so rare, it is like a superpower. -Dave Ramsey
Purpose
Critical thinking is an abstract concept that is vital to nursing. The ability to operationalize essential thinking can be difficult. This assignment aims to help the student search through the literature and select empirical evidence associated with critical thinking.
End of Course Outcomes
Describe various theoretical frameworks for decision-making in clinical, ethical, and leadership contexts.
End of Program Student Learning Outcomes
Influence Health Care Policy for Advocacy in Health Care
Apply Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice
Integrate Scientific Underpinnings into Practice
Nurse Executive Role-Specific Competencies
Effective Communication and Relationship Building
Knowledge of the Healthcare Environment
Leadership
Due Date: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 3 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Points: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
Requirements
à This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
à Create your manuscript using the version of Microsoft Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”
à Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
à The length of the paper will be about between 4-6 pages excluding title page and reference pages.
à A minimum of 2 scholarly references (not your textbooks but primary sources of theory and research).
à The textbook required for this course may be used as a reference for this assignment but does not count towards the required minimum number of scholarly references.
à APA format and effective writing is required for the paper. Use your APA manual or Purdue Owl to check and correct your formatting. Use Grammarly, Tutor Source, and the grammar and spelling check on your Word Processor and criteria for effective writing to assure that your paper well written.
à Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
à This paper will be submitted through Turnitin. A Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
Directions and Grading Criteria
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Executive |
10 |
10 |
Give |
|
Empirical · Watson-Glaser |
40 |
40 |
History of the tool: Who created Functionality: Questions list on tool; meaning of the results. DNP Project: How will this information (critical thinking) aid in the
|
|
Evaluation
|
20 |
20 |
Which tool is more user friendly? |
|
Implication to nursing |
10 |
10 |
How does understanding critical |
|
Conclusion |
10 |
10 |
Summarize |
|
APA |
10 |
10 |
Adheres to the |
|
Maintain |
Mandatory |
Mandatory |
Adheres |
|
Total: |
100 |
=SUM(ABOVE) 100 |
A |
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment |
Meets |
Mostly Meets Criteria |
Partially |
Does |
|
|
Introduction
(10 points) |
Outstanding introduction on
10 points |
Substantive introduction on critical
8 points |
Good introduction on critical
6 |
Satisfactory introduction on
4 |
|
|
Empirical Critical Thinking Tools
· ·
(40 points) |
Outstanding information on CCTST & WGCTA History of the tool: Who created Functionality: Questions list on tool; meaning of the results. DNP Project: How will this information (critical thinking) aid in the 36-40 points |
Substantive information on CCTST History of the tool: Who created Functionality: Questions list on tool; meaning of the results. DNP Project: How will this information (critical thinking) aid in the
31-35 points |
Good information on CCTST & History of the tool: Who created Functionality: Questions list on tool; meaning of the results. DNP Project: How will this information (critical thinking) aid in the
26-30 points |
Satisfactory information on CCTST History of the tool: Who created Functionality: Questions list on tool; meaning of the results. DNP Project: How will this information (critical thinking) aid in the
0-25 points |
|
|
Evaluation
20 points |
Outstanding evaluation of CCTST 18-20 points |
Substantive evaluation of CCTST & WGCTA. The following
14-17 points |
Good evaluation of CCTST & WGCTA. The following
11-13 points |
Satisfactory evaluation of CCTST
10-0 points |
|
|
Implication to
(10 points) |
Outstanding discussion in how critical thinking and its
9-10 points |
Substantive discussion in how critical thinking and its
7-8 points |
Good discussion in how critical thinking and its empirical
5-6 points |
Satisfactory discussion in how
0-4 points |
|
|
Conclusion (10 points) |
Outstanding summary 9-10 points |
Substantive summary 7-8 points |
Good summary 5-6 points |
Satisfactory 0-4 points |
|
|
APA formatting and Scholarly
(10 points) |
Writes in a scholarly manner with 9-10 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with 7-8 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with 5-6 points |
Does not write in a scholarly 0 – 4 point |
|
|
Maintains paper within length requirements (Up to 10 |
Adheres
No point
Met |
Paper
4-5 point Not Met |
Paper
6-8 point Not Met |
Paper
Not met |
|
|
|
Total Points Possible = __100 points |
||||