Your task is to apply the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) to this scenario and develop a 2–3 page role description for a graduate-level nurse leader serving on the implementation team. The focus is on ensuring

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2-
to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her
participation on the implementation team. The role description should be
based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and
should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each
of the following steps:·   Planning and requirements
definition·   Analysis·   Design of the new
system·   Implementation·   Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentUsing the
literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role
description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on
the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will
participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and
requirements.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodUsing the
literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that
supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life
Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of
these steps: definition of planning and requirements.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response
elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is
incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis·
Design of the new system

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentUsing the
literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role
description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on
the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will
participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new
system.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodUsing the
literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that
supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life
Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of
these steps: analysis and design of the new system.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response
elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is
incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome·
Implementation· Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentUsing the
literature and course resources:…An accurate and fully developed role
description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on
the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will
participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation
support.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodUsing the
literature and course resources:…A role description is provided that
supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life
Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of
these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response
elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is
incomplete, inaccurate, or missing

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentAssignment
includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 ptsGoodAssignment includes:
2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 ptsFairAssignment includes:
1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 ptsPoorAssignment includes: 1
or no resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten
Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long
and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and
sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and
sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of
the time.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and
sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79%
of the time.

2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and
sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60%
of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten
Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct
grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2)
grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several
(3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5)
grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten
Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for
title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,
parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA
format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2)
APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several
(3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA
format errors.

5 pts